I am creating this board to get some discussion going about Gravity. First and foremost how many of you think we were designed correctly to operate in the gravity field, whatever you might define it to be.

Any thoughts here about the Atomic Expansion Theory? I know it is hard to wrap your head around.

I contend this, although it can't be measured as everyone agrees. There is an absolute pressure of space and possibly matter for account. As everything has its own natural frequency of vibration. It stands to reason this vibration would exert some kind of natural relative pressure. Gerald you are the frequency expert, but I think in my mind as we accelerate in time the amplitude is increasing thus causing the expansion while the frequency stays the same expanding with the surrounding universe. Could this be a possible explanation for the dark matter and energy albeit very simple as it it exactly as our atmosphere, when compressed heat energy of the matter naturally increases. I anxiously await your comment.

Hi zrigger, Yes, the atomic expansion rate is the same everywhere and can be thought of a atomic pressure when contacting another atom or molecule but expansion where the electrons cross the threshold to untethered expansion aside from the molecule. Roland is answering any and all questions posted on the EP3 Gravity and You Final Theory video on my YT channel. The professor is holding office hours, for a while so be sure to hit him up. Check out his response distinguishing gravity from static electricity, amazing mind.

I'm not talking about molecules or atoms bumping aginst one another. What I mean is like absolute pressure of the universe. Although we haven't figured out how to measure it yet. Like measuring the weight of water under water. This pressure cannot be measured because we are in it and don't know how to create a space void of it. This would be the pressure left over after the Big Bang, if there ever was one. When the balloon popped "big bang" it made a noise through the fabric of space. The cosmic microwave radio background noise. If not the fabric of space what are these microwaves bouncing off of. We could be like a bubble rising from the ocean floor on our way to some cosmic surface ready to pop. Although this will certainly never be known.

I see that the "pressure of the universe" is caused by expanding matter starting at the atomic level and extrapolating to planets. Thoth describes the creation event from the 9th dimension circle of light where the Law of Time and Law of Matter were established. The Big Bang was not a local event, but rather a system wide event. I see the "cosmic bg radiation noise" as coinciding with the concept of what we call electromagnetism and light. According to expansion theory, light is composed of groups of electrons which exhibit entanglement such that a distant galaxy being formed can eject electron streams suddenly that impact other areas of the universe. This is the issue that LIGO used to declare gravity is a temporary accident caused by the interraction of two galaxies. Pose any questions you have on the Youtube video interview I did with Roland. He is monitoring questions and is open to answering all.

Gerald and other interested members if I told you what the key is to understanding gravity was, you would possibly read one or two more sentences beyond that statement. In short my initial researcher began with some very simple fundamental questions about the process that occur within the structure of the sub-atomic particle. The research I did was just for my own personal understanding and was not my intent at the time that it would be shared publicly. Although I possess some skills communication is difficult.
I believe the understanding that I gained or better stated received was a gift. I know it sound so cliché, ask and you shall receive, but the individual still needs to do the hard work to get there.
So in brief the discernment’s I made of the processes taking place within the sub-atomic particle are possibly the lowest level of a recurring fractal system that occurs throughout the universe. Thus due to the nature of a fractal systems the same processes are at work everywhere regardless of where one examines the system. I wish it were that simple but it is much more complicated than the structures at the atomic level. Size matters, with that I mean uniform size. I will analogize the sub-atomic is the purest smallest and there for the most simple portion of the creation, whereas solar systems, galaxies and the universe display the lack of uniformity which makes for the diversity which we observe.
With that said the same rules of motion, attraction, repulsion, and bonding still do apply throughout these systems.
I will need to build a case of evidence to support my theories. It will be easier to first address big ”G” as without visual aids the structure of the sub-atomic could not be comprehended. For those interested you will have to do your own back ground research, links will not be provided as its best to do your own searches.
Will start in 1976 when the world of Astor-physics should have stood still. Vera Rubin an American astronomer completed a study of 60 spiral galaxies accompanied by Canadian Kent Ford. The outcome became known as Galaxy Rotational Problem (GRP) What Vera and Kent’s research had proofed was that the stars within every galaxy they did red shift observations on were not moving as was expected. That is that the stars near the center of the galaxy were moving at the same rate of speed as the stars near the outer regions of the galaxy. For those of you that are uninformed, this is when the sudden need for dark matter and/or dark energy began. Attempting to cling to their Newtonian Physics more matter would have to be present or these galaxies would simple fling star out into space. The reason I bring this to the attention of the reader is threefold; first when Vera submit her first paper the study of 6 spiral galaxies she was nearly laugh out of academia in other words, our so called best and brightest minds were so convoluted in their belief systems as to not except the obvious data. I.e. if one studies an image of a spiral galaxy one immediately recognizes the spiral effects present in the image, in other words it wouldn’t look like a spiraling galaxy, if in fact it were moving as they had expected it would look more like a spinning blob of stars. Second how can these scientists take in this information I.e. that presumably all the matter in the universe the galaxies are moving in this way but in our solar system matter seems to be moving quite differently and not even debate this. Third and most important why does the scientific community ignore and not have debate about the obvious presents of Phi spirals that also relate directly back to the Fibonacci series.
As the cleaver reader may have already discerned an important component of my research involves what some may call sacred geometry that is Phi and the Fibonacci series.
It became central in my research after which time I had model my sub-atomic structure, prior to that I was unaware of its presents throughout the universe. These structures of the Phi and Fibonacci series can be witnessed through all things made of matter and the energy systems that accompany them.
All organic, and what we currently classify as inorganic, display these reoccurring relationships to Phi.
I suggest the obvious, that is that if hydrogen is the fundamental smallest manifestation of what we perceive as matter and that all the elements of our periodic chart are constructs created with energy systems that utilize an expanding system that relates not only to Phi, but Pi as well.
The very same fundamental energy that is present in a single atom of hydrogen is absolutely directly related to what we conceive as gravity.

So before I begin to explain gravity, I will offer a couple of thing to ponder. The inner most planets within our solar system are approximately spaced from the sun outward on what can easily be described as an expansion rate of Phi. Arguments quite welcome. Not only is this spacing of planetary bodies near Phi spacing significant to locations, but the deviation or amount of deviation thereof off the Phi spacing is also directly related to the amount of axis tilt each planet exhibits within the system. This will not be discussed at this time due to the need of visual aids.
Moving on to more proofs.
The sun rotates on its axis approximately every 28 earth days. For demonstration purposes I am assigning the rotational rate of the sun to 28.09 earth days.
By simply multiplying the Fibonacci sires by our preset orbital rate of the sun please observer the results.
1. 1
2. 1 X 28.09 = 28.09
3. 2 X 28.09 = 56.18*
4. 3 X 28.09 = 84.27 Mercury 87.969 days NASA
5. 5 X 28.09= -------
6. 8 X 28.09 = 224.72 Venus 224.701 days NASA
7. 13 X 28-09 = 365.17 Earth 365.256 days NASA
Your welcome to continue to multiple the rest of this Fibonacci series, if you do you will see it breaks down significantly but overall accuracy is near 90% of predicted which is also mirrored in the axis tilt modeling.
We live in a solar system that has seen many calamities over time, just as Gerald has hope that we can improve through SI our relationship with gravity so has Gaia had to endure the damage that have occurred throughout the destructive periods of millenniums.
If of interest I will share more.